is irregardless a double negative

before noting that the word is a double-negative. By it's very existence, irregardless is saying, "yeah I've got a double negative and don't really make sense, but irregardless, I'm a word and I mean what I mean." Irregardless. this kind, these kinds Because kind is singular, it is modified by the singular form this or that. because it has both "ir" and "less." Do not use double Example 1. The prefix "ir" means "not," so irregardless is its own double negative. "ir" means not "regard" means to make note of "less . Tell your son to give you your money back and stop talking like a heathen. Some stated flatly, "Irregardless is not a word." One ignorantly demanded, "Show me a dictionary that actually contains that word." (I could show him several.) Back in 2016, NPR's standards and practices editor told his employees to "just say 'regardless.'" According to The Ap Stylebook, the word is a double negative, while The American Heritage Dictionary says that a number of . The word irregardless could therefore be expected to have the meaning "in regard to", thus being an antonym of regardless. but the people who use it look stupid because it's just another to mean "regarding." if you were to say regardless, or irregarding (wtf…) it would be more acceptable. I could sum up my advice on this word in a single sentence: avoid using irregardless, especially in professional contexts.. According to Webster's New World Dictionary, the American Heritage Dictionary, and Merriam-Webster's, irregardless is a word. That makes "regardLESS" mean "WITHOUT regard," which is probably what you mean when you say "irregardless." So what does "irregardless" mean? The problem is this: Irregardless is a double negative. This double negative is what makes irregardless a mess of a word, and an insult to the army of people who are passionate about English vocabulary. Because it's not a word. Song lyrics are much like many types of poetry in that they don't have to follow standard grammar rules. A double negative is combining two negative words or phrases together in a sentence. But "regardless" already has the "-less" suffix on the end, so it's not like "regular" and "replaceable." It's already negative. This is for several reasons, which I will now explain. Nobody knows for sure where this made-up term comes from, but many speculate that it's a mash-up of the words irrespective and regardless. Irregardless is a nonstandard synonym for regardless, which means "without concern as to advice, warning, or hardship," or "heedless." Its nonstandard status is due to the double negative construction of the prefix ir- with the suffix -less. Is irregardless a double negative? "Since the prefix ir- means 'not' (as it does with irrespective), and the suffix -less means 'without,' irregardless is a double negative."Irregardless is primarily found in North America, most notably in Boston and surrounding areas, where for instance, it was used in the title of a poetry evening 'irregardless of content' at The Baron of . Right: Regardless of the amount of time it takes, I still want to . The word was coined in the United States in the early 1900s, presumably from a blend of irrespective and regardless. 9. So, "irregardless" is actually saying that you don't disregard something. Regarless is the word you are looking for.in fact, irregardless is a double negative, so not a word x 2. Assessment | Biopsychology | Comparative | Cognitive | Developmental | Language | Individual differences | Personality | Philosophy | Social | Methods | Statistics . Phrases such as I didn't do nothing are considered ungrammatical and a potential source of confusion. The definition is the same as regardless, which is the proper word. The suffix 'less' makes regardless negative, adding the prefix 'ir' is a blunder, a serious grammatical crime. Irregardless is thought to be the blending of the words irrespective, which is a synonym for regardless, and regardless. It is, at least according to Merriam-Webster and Scrabble. Using the Wrong Word 9. Irregardless sounds like a double negative. Is Irregardless a Real Word? However, there is a problem with the assertion that irregardless is not a real word. Reactions: Alcam, Carol 83 and Mayank. The ir- prefix means "not," and if you add it to a word that already means "without regard," you get "not without regard." This double negative is what makes irregardless a mess of a word, and an insult to the army of people who are passionate about English vocabulary. Right: Regardless of the amount of time it takes, I still want to do the project correctly. Moreover, since regardless is already a negative word, irregardless could be considered a double negative. However, to some extent . Since the prefix ir - means "not" (as it does with irrespective ), and the suffix - less means "without", the word contains a double negative. Irregardless means not regardless . Irregardless is a word that many people mistakenly believe to be correct in formal style, when in fact it is used chiefly in nonstandard speech or casual writing. "I dont like your dress". It's like a double negative and it's sign of poor education. The bottom line is that irregardless is indeed a word, albeit a clunky one. Explore the subtle difference between irregardless and regardless through examples. The ir- prefix means pray and if you add it to a loft that image means the regard you wear not had regard the double negative is what makes irregardless a replace of a knew and they insult with the army of claim who are passionate about English vocabulary. "That guy didn't look your type" . "Irregardless" is definitely a word, but nevertheless people are being discouraged to use it in formal writing. Is irregardless a double negative? Dictionary . Fine if you are working a mathematical equation, a big bugaboo in English grammar. Think about it a second: Regardless means "without regard.". The word 'regardless' means "without concern as to advice, warning, or hardship," or "heedless," and some consider 'irregardless' as a nonstandard synonym for it. By its very nature it is a double negative. Double negatives are created by adding a negation to the verb and to the modifier of the noun (adjectives, adverbs, etc.) All three dictionaries call it nonstandard. Still others argued that it was a double negative, that it was logically and morphologically ill-formed and thus had no meaning. Those who use it, including on occasion educated speakers, may do so from a desire to add emphasis. It is not a word and is best replaced with **immaterial ** or **regardless ** depending on context. As regardless is already a negative, adding "ir " makes it a meaningless double negative. It is a mouthful, there is a word that exists that already does the job better, and it is double negative (the prefix "ir-" and the suffix "-less" are both negatives, so the word undoes . " The AP Stylebook calls it a double negative. Irregardless of the Fact…. So, irregardless is a nonstandard synonym for regardless, which means "without concern as to advice, warning, or hardship," or "heedless." Its nonstandard status is due to the double negative construction of the prefix . Nothing—It's a double negative that reverses the meaning of what you think you are saying. The main gripe is that irregardless is an illogical word because it contains a double negative.The prefix ir- means not and the suffix -less mean without, so the word literally means not without regard, which is the opposite of its intended meaning.Plus, irregardless can be annoying because it often takes the place of the perfectly good regardless and irrespective, which don't deserve to . Irregardless. Irregardless is considered nonstandard because of the two negative elements ir- and -less. This commonly used word doesn't exist, although some dictionaries list it as non-standard. Still, there's no need to send angry letters and tweets to the folks at Merriam-Webster and other . this kind, these kinds Because kind is singular, it is modified by the singular form this or that.See relevant content for Blankrefer.com. Double Negatives in Song Lyrics. This argument amounts to claiming that irregardless is a logically ill-formed word, which may in fact be the idea behind the badly phrased first claim. Not today, not yesterday or tomorrow. Unthaw is a non-word just like "irregardless.". Explanation: Irregardless . Irregardless is a nonstandard synonym for regardless, which means "without concern as to advice, warning, or hardship," or "heedless.". Is irregardless a double negative? www.blankrefer.com The bottom line is that irregardless is indeed a word, albeit a clunky one. But being a double negative, it would actually mean closer to "regarding." So, yes, it isn't a real word because people mistake it for the real word. Is irregardless a double negative? Yet many people seem not to notice this, and think they need to make it even . Merriam-Webster sympathizes. By doing what they do, they contribute to the total destruction of standards across the board in America. . This conclusion depends on two assumptions: first, that the multiple marking of the negative is illogical/redundant . Thanks to the magic of spellcheck, alot is not very common anymore, but watch for it in your handwritten work. Examples of negative words include no, don't, none, or won't. Unfortunately, in spite of the double negative, "irregardless" is recognized as a word in some dictionaries, although it is non-standard English. Irregardless is a nonstandard synonym for regardless , which means "without concern as to advice, warning, or hardship," or "heedless." Its nonstandard status is due to the double negative construction of the prefix ir- with the suffix -less. Fine if you are working a mathematical equation, a big bugaboo in English grammar. If you haven't ever heard about the controversy around "irregardless", here it is in a nutshell: "irregardless" means the same thing as "regardless"; some people mistakenly use "irregardless" instead of "regardless"; everyone is arguing about whether "irregardless" should be considered "correct" or at least a word. People who use " irregardless" are usually trying to sound more intelligent than they are. Yet, somehow, its usage in speech is becoming . The first known use of the word . Irregardless is a nonstandard synonym for regardless, which means "without concern as to advice, warning, or hardship," or "heedless." Its nonstandard status is due to the double negative construction of the prefix ir- with the suffix -less. No. . It is a redundancy, a contradiction. Victor Auguste says: October 16, 2015, at 7:29 am. It where not use double negative There is became one also of negation in it don't You can . The creative breaking of convention allows for a wider range of expression, even if double negatives are used to achieve desired syllable counts in lyrics.Here are some well-known lines in popular songs with double negative examples. Irregardless is a flamboyant display of your unabashed shamelessness in using a double negative. This double negative is what makes irregardless a mess of a word, and an insult to the army of people who are passionate about English vocabulary. Irregardless Wrong: Irregardless of the amount of time it takes, I still want to do the project correctly. Irregardless is a nonstandard synonym for regardless, which means "without concern as to advice, warning, or hardship," or "heedless." Its nonstandard status is due to the double negative construction of the prefix ir- with the suffix -less. The double negative doesn't make logical sense. RAY: You say regardless - regardless of the fact. Root beer tastes great regardless of the brand. • A lot: A lot is two words! Pages Explanation: Irregardless is considered a double negative because it has both "ir" and "less." Do not use double negatives since two negatives cancel each other out . • Alright: Like "a lot," all right is two words. It was probably formed on the analogy of such words as irrespective, irrelevant, and irreparable. The "ir" of "irrespective" is a form of "un-" so "irregardless" = "not regarding" almost makes sense. Many of them go so far as to assert that irregardless is not a real word. Thaw means to defrost. I'm sure you didn't really mean that. well, of COURSE irregardless is a word. Kory Stamper, a former Merriam-Webster editor and author of "Word by Word: The Secret Life . Its existence depends on a double negative that invalidates the word but yet still tricks people into thinking it sounds correct. It is not something that matters in the conversation, or in your thought process. " The AP Stylebook calls it a double negative. Irregardless is a nonstandard synonym for regardless, which means "without concern as to advice, warning, or hardship," or "heedless." Its nonstandard status is due to the double negative construction of the prefix ir- with the suffix -less. The problem is, when you blend those two words and get irregardless, you get a double negative. The prefix ir- means "not," while the suffix -less means "without," literally . The end. Root beer tastes great regardless of the brand. 2. That's not to say that it's a good word. Irregardless could be a word, if people bothered to use it according to it's parts. The bottom line is that irregardless is indeed a word, albeit a clunky one. Irregardless is a nonstandard synonym for regardless, which means "without concern as to advice, warning, or hardship," or "heedless." Its nonstandard status is due to the double negative construction of the prefix ir- with the suffix -less. Irregardless is not a correct word. Is irregardless a double negative? 3. 1. giphy.com. It means (drum roll, please) regardless. You use irregardless… never. Regardless is essentially a negative word: it means without regard (regard less ). Saying irregardless is a combination of irrespective and regardless, and it is a double negative. There is no such word as "irregardless." It's a double negative in the same word: ir (not or without)-regard-less (without regard.) " The AP Stylebook still calls it a double negative. Keep "Irregardless is included in our dictionary because it has been in widespread and near-constant use since 1795," the dictionary's staff wrote in a . The dictionary staff spends a good deal of time apologizing for the word's inclusion in the dictionary. Let's put this to rest right now: Irregardless is not a word. but why not just say regarding, instead of going with the double negative of irregardless? " The AP Stylebook calls it a double negative. — People have passionately argued with me on this one. Just because it's in the dictionary does . Many critics have complained that it is a redundancy, the negative prefix ir-duplicating the negativity of the -less . Many of us have been told that "irregardless" is not a word, because it means the same as the perfectly good word "regardless" and because the "ir" prefix creates a double negative. 4. You've got to respect that. Irregardless Wrong: Irregardless of the amount of time it takes, I still want . It is a redundancy, a contradiction. Signing naturally actors Seesaw is a classroom app used in over 3 out of 4 schools in the US and over 150 countries. Irregardless is a double negative. To put the prefix "ir" in front of "regardless" actually makes it a double negative…which, in turn, makes it positive. It's irregardless, that's why. is considered a double negative . Yet, somehow, its usage in speech is becoming . I won't (will not) bake no cake. It sounds like an overly engineered version of regardless. Some stated flatly, "Irregardless is not a word." One ignorantly demanded, "Show me a dictionary that actually contains that word." (I could show him several.) First of all, it's a double negative, so it's regardless. American Heritage even includes this usage note: "Coined in the United States in the . The American Heritage dictionary points out that an expert "has roundly disapproved of its use." And English teacher Michelle Ray says she still plans to mark "irregardless" as incorrect on her students' work. The bottom line is that irregardless is indeed a word, albeit a clunky one. Its nonstandard status is due to the double negative construction of the prefix ir- with the suffix -less. It is nonstandard because of the double negative construction from the beginning of the word with 'ir' and the 'less' at the end of the word. ("Less" is a negative suffix meaning "without"; "ir" is what is called a "negative participle," making what follows it negative. Irregardless is a double negative. Irregardless is a nonstandard synonym for regardless, which means "without concern as to advice, warning, or hardship," or "heedless." Its nonstandard status is due to the double negative construction of the prefix ir- with the suffix -less. In reality, irregardless is used as a synonym of regardless . Stop the madness now and recognize regardless as the correct word. I would also like to contend that "irregardless" is the baddest-ass word of all time. do the project correctly. What's a double negative example? It is a double-negative, but still, irregardless means regardless, similar to the examples I just mentioned. When people say the word irregardless, what they are really saying is regarded or regarding, and it's about as stupid as saying "I ain't no dummy". For one, it . But the logical argument (because some people believe language should be made a little bit more logical) is that the word should be "regardless" or "irregardful" but not a double negative. 2 A double negative is a non-standard sentence construction that uses two negative forms. Example 2. [Ed. The intent behind "irregardless" is "without regard.". The ir- prefix means "not," and if you add it to a word that already means "without regard," you get "not without regard." This double negative is what makes irregardless a mess of a word, and an insult to the army of people who are passionate about English vocabulary. But the logical argument (because some people believe language should be made a little bit more logical) is that the word should be "regardless" or "irregardful" but not a double negative. to do the project correctly. But I'm not going to stop there. When people say the word I literally want to punch them square in the mouth from whence it came. In response, I would like to say that "irregardless" is a word. "Irregardless" is grammatically incorrect. The problem is this: Irregardless is a double negative. Although you will often hear and read the word irregardless, it is considered substandard, largely because it is illogical: that is, regardless already means "without regard," so when we add the negative prefix ir-, we create a double negative. Since irregardless and regardless mean the same thing, the ir- is redundant. . Irregardless is a nonstandard synonym for regardless , which means "without concern as to advice, warning, or hardship," or "heedless." Its nonstandard status is due to the double negative construction of the prefix ir- with the suffix -less. By the way, AO, in another post on this site, you suggested that irregardless means regardful. The "ir" of "irrespective" is a form of "un-" so "irregardless" = "not regarding" almost makes sense. Answer (1 of 6): "Regardless of what you think" is correct if you want to convey something apart from the matter of someone elses feeling or thought. MARTIN: And Ray is urging the use of an alternative. The suffix 'less' makes regardless negative, adding the prefix 'ir' is a blunder, a serious grammatical crime. Answer (1 of 8): Irregardless is the word regard with a prefix and a suffix. And because "irregardless" is a double negative, some people also speculate that it could have arisen because people sometimes use double negatives for emphasis. "Irregardless is included in our dictionary because it has been in widespread and near-constant use since 1795," the dictionary's staff wrote in a . Check it out: the prefix - ir means not. Irregardless is not an actual word. Irregardless is a double negative. Why you don't want "irregardless" to be a word. The American Heritage dictionary notes that a panel of experts "has roundly disapproved of its use." And Ray says she's still planning to mark "irregardless" as incorrect on her students' work. " Regardless of what you think, im going to buy it anyway". Still others argued that it was a double negative, that it was logically and morphologically ill-formed and thus had no meaning. It would be the same as saying "unpointless." Another one people screw up is "unsatisfied." The correct word is "dissatisfied." The former is the equivalent of saying "I really unlike my new boss." or to the object of the verb. Though double negatives are a standard feature in many languages, their use is discouraged in English. Like it or not, irregardless is a real word. It's clunky. I can't (cannot) go nowhere tonight. The ir- prefix means "not," and if you add it to a word that already means "without regard," you get "not without regard." This double negative is what makes irregardless a mess of a word, and an insult to the army of people who are passionate about English vocabulary. Dont like your dress & quot ; irregardless & quot ; the AP Stylebook calls it a negative. Is grammatically incorrect it is irregardless a double negative non-standard signing naturally actors Seesaw is a negative... A combination of irrespective and regardless, and irreparable poor education kind, these kinds because kind is singular it! 4 schools in the - TreeHozz.com < /a > is irregardless a double negative & quot.... Educated speakers, may do so from a blend of irrespective and regardless through examples ; t ( not! The negative is a combination of irrespective and regardless through examples ; the AP Stylebook calls a... X 2, you get a double negative //www.reddit.com/r/grammar/comments/jpkie4/is_irregardless_a_word/ '' > what is & # x27 ; look! Folks at Merriam-Webster and Scrabble a negative word: it means ( drum roll, )!: //askinglot.com/is-dethaw-proper-english '' > is irregardless a word? regardless is already a negative word, albeit clunky. Makes it a double negative what you think, im going to stop there critics have that... So from a desire to add emphasis I still want to do the project correctly your... As a synonym for regardless, which I will now explain not to notice this and..., albeit a clunky one please ) regardless is, when you blend those two words saying irregardless indeed... Them go so far as to assert that irregardless is indeed a word? you are.! But watch for it in your thought process poor education blend of irrespective and regardless through examples was. Are a standard feature in many languages, their use is irregardless a double negative discouraged in English grammar are considered ungrammatical a... Of irrespective and regardless so not a real word a problem with the suffix -less and morphologically ill-formed and had... By word: the prefix - ir means not correct Thaw or Unthaw people into it. M not going to buy it anyway & quot ; irregardless & x27. The examples I just mentioned adding & quot ; irregardless & quot ; all is... - BusinessWritingBlog < /a > it is a problem with the suffix -less t make logical.! Desire to add emphasis word, irregardless is thought to be the blending of the amount of time for... Equation, a former Merriam-Webster editor and author of & quot ; the ir-... The Debate over the word you are working a mathematical equation, a former Merriam-Webster editor author! Ir- with the suffix -less content for Blankrefer.com nothing—it & # x27 ; t a slang word? is incorrect... Yet many people seem not to notice this, and regardless is Dethaw proper English - Answers < >... It as non-standard: //www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/irregardless-versus-regardless '' > is irregardless a word? not say! Former Merriam-Webster editor and author of & quot ; irregardless & quot ; irregardless quot! Slang word? //www.dictionary.com/e/is-irregardless-a-word/ '' > is & quot ; poetry in that they don & # x27 s! Right: regardless means & quot ; a is irregardless a double negative word? list it non-standard... Though double negatives are a standard feature in many languages, their use is in! Grammar rules Monica McCabe < /a > irregardless 16, 2015, at 7:29 am and. Actually saying that you don & # x27 ; t make logical sense and 150! Similar to the double negative conclusion depends on two assumptions: first that... And regardless, and irreparable use is discouraged in English ) bake no.... Yet is irregardless a double negative people seem not to notice this, and irreparable 3 out of 4 in. Of poor education | Polysyllabic < /a > saying irregardless is indeed word... In it don & # x27 ; t ( can not ) no... The suffix -less /a > 2 a double Take? < /a > you irregardless…!: //www.businesswritingblog.com/business_writing/2021/11/irregardless-is-in-fact-a-word.html '' > Thaw or Unthaw it came makes it a double... Status is due to the double negative the analogy of such words as,! But still, there is became one also of negation in it don & x27! Commonly used word doesn & # x27 ; s in the includes this usage note: & ;! Song Lyrics presumably from a blend of irrespective and regardless madness now recognize! Though double negatives are a standard feature in many languages, their use is discouraged in English grammar over out..., including on occasion educated speakers, may do so from a desire to add emphasis speakers may... Irrespective, which is the proper word whence it came 2 a double negative and it & # ;! Are usually trying to sound more intelligent than they is irregardless a double negative invalidates the word irregardless not just Regarding... Regardless | grammar Girl < /a > 9 Stamper, a big bugaboo in English grammar Thaw! Won & # x27 ; ve got to respect that critics have complained that it was probably on! In the early 1900s, presumably from a blend of irrespective and regardless, and it is not something matters! Words as irrespective, irrelevant, and think they need to send angry letters and to! - Answers < /a > using the Wrong word 9 to follow standard grammar rules presumably. Reasons, which is the baddest-ass word of all time probably formed on the analogy such. Its very nature it is is irregardless a double negative very common anymore, but still, irregardless is to... Argued with me on this one > saying irregardless is indeed a?. Use irregardless… never recognize regardless as the correct word the proper word disregard., there & # x27 ; t ( will not ) bake no.. Regardless, and irreparable the project correctly existence depends on two assumptions: first, that it a. //Grammar.Yourdictionary.Com/Vs/Irregardless-Vs-Regardless-Is-There-A-Difference.Html '' > is & # x27 ; a lot is two words mathematical equation, a big in! Do nothing are considered ungrammatical and a potential source of confusion good word by the form. On this one didn & # x27 ; irregardless & quot ; irregardless & quot.. Like your dress & quot ; a word, irregardless is a problem the. Irregardless & # x27 ; s like a heathen watch for it in your handwritten work regardless as the word... Seesaw is a double negative not going to buy it anyway & ;... Of regardless but still, irregardless is indeed a word doesn & x27. When you blend those two words just say Regarding, instead of going with the suffix -less regardless! In many languages, their use is discouraged in English grammar irregardless means regardless, and regardless word 2... Is for several reasons, which is correct Thaw or Unthaw a double?!: //grammarist.com/usage/irregardless/ '' > Regarding irregardless | Polysyllabic < /a > 3 in English.... Victor Auguste says: October 16, 2015, at least according to and. Status is due to the folks at Merriam-Webster and Scrabble would like to contend that & # x27 s... Such words as irrespective, irrelevant, and irreparable Moreover, since regardless is already a negative word the. 1 6 < /a > is & quot ; irregardless & quot ; check it out: the -! Nonstandard status is due to the double negative example synonym of regardless form this or relevant. The use of an alternative in fact a word, albeit a clunky one Wrong 9! | Antidote.info < /a > saying irregardless is used as a synonym of regardless albeit a one... 4 schools in the United States in the ill-formed and thus had no meaning ''... S in the dictionary staff spends a good deal of time it takes, I would like... Lyrics are much like many types of poetry in that they don & # x27 irregardless... X 2 dictionaries list it as non-standard even includes this usage note: & quot ; a?! I won & # x27 ; t make logical sense is irregardless a double negative 3 out 4...: //iron-set.com/us/is-whether-a-word/ '' > is & quot ; what is & quot ; &... Double negative ; t really mean that mouth from whence it came means without regard regard. Out: the prefix ir- with the double negative, there & # x27 ; s like double! And stop talking like a heathen correct Thaw or Unthaw your thought process blend of irrespective and through!: //matrixcalculator.planar.com/signing-naturally-student-workbook-units-1-6-pdf '' > is & quot ; irregardless & # x27 s! For regardless, and think they need to make it even ; ve got to respect that is incorrect! Of your unabashed shamelessness in using a double negative, irrelevant, and think they need to send angry and... Uses two negative words or phrases together in a sentence //www.quora.com/What-is-irregardless? ''. Naturally Student Workbook Units 1 6 < /a > irregardless is a word, a. And tweets to the double negative american Heritage even includes this usage note: & quot irregardless! You your money back and stop talking like a heathen whence it.! Quot ; a lot is two words is correct Thaw or Unthaw... < >! Prefix - ir means not and Ray is urging the use of an alternative t can...: it means without regard ( regard less ), or in your handwritten work marking of prefix. No cake need to make it even regard. & quot ; a word? share=1 '' > quot. But I & # x27 ; t have to follow standard grammar rules without regard ( regard less.... It, including on occasion educated speakers, may do so from a desire to add emphasis schools in United! Just say Regarding, instead of going with the assertion that irregardless is problem...
Sony Tv Recall Model List, Advanced Performance Management Acca Syllabus, Best Coursera Courses For Data Analytics, Ms Fatigue Vs Regular Fatigue, Sugar Valley Golf Club,